On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 06:27:33PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is this done in a way such that it can be set by the customization key >> >> process? I can imagine that many groups will prefer the ring to random >> >> and want to make it an installation default. >> > >> > Not right now, but would be quite easy to add an option to the control >> > panel and let customization keys change the stored preference. >> >> Even if not exposed in the cp UI we should at least have an hidden >> preference. >> We have no way right to customize sugar profiles but we should have one. >> >> Marco > > I'm interested by the (implicit) idea that (all?) settings modifiable > through the control panel should also be customizable. However, as I > pointed out not long ago, some care needs to be taken to restrict the > ability of the customization process to violate our security principles. > > As a strawman, how about using a convention or technology similar to > > http://thedjbway.org/daemontools/envdir.html > > to record the key-value settings that make up the bulk of the > 'customizable' features?
I'd rather use GConf which is what all the software we depend on uses and understand. Marco _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
