On 21.06.2008, at 10:25, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 06:27:33PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > wrote: >>>>> Is this done in a way such that it can be set by the >>>>> customization key >>>>> process? I can imagine that many groups will prefer the ring to >>>>> random >>>>> and want to make it an installation default. >>>> >>>> Not right now, but would be quite easy to add an option to the >>>> control >>>> panel and let customization keys change the stored preference. >>> >>> Even if not exposed in the cp UI we should at least have an hidden >>> preference. >>> We have no way right to customize sugar profiles but we should >>> have one. >>> >>> Marco >> >> I'm interested by the (implicit) idea that (all?) settings modifiable >> through the control panel should also be customizable. However, as I >> pointed out not long ago, some care needs to be taken to restrict the >> ability of the customization process to violate our security >> principles. >> >> As a strawman, how about using a convention or technology similar to >> >> http://thedjbway.org/daemontools/envdir.html >> >> to record the key-value settings that make up the bulk of the >> 'customizable' features? > > I'd rather use GConf which is what all the software we depend on uses > and understand.
I'd rather not tie Sugar too closely to Gnome. I like Michael's strawman. - Bert - _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
