Am 23.10.2008 um 15:33 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > bert wrote: >> Am 23.10.2008 um 15:15 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> >>> an addition to activity.info, with sensible defaults, would be the >>> best bet, i think. >> >> This would mean that sometimes the shell and sometimes the activity >> would have to handle that key, which is fragile. I'd opt for the >> shell >> always handling the key, then trying to invoke the activity's view >> source function, and if that fails, handle it itself. >> >> That "not handled by activity" case could of course be customized by >> entries in activity.info. > > sure, that's fine. but i think we need to keep thinking about > how to support of non-, or not-fully-sugarized applications with > every new feature we do (as well as with every revision of old > features).
Right. Hence the fallback to the default viewer if the activity does not implement that (or any) DBus method. Or did I misunderstand you? - Bert - _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
