On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:19 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:33 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sure, that's fine. but i think we need to keep thinking about >> how to support of non-, or not-fully-sugarized applications with >> every new feature we do (as well as with every revision of old >> features). > > I've got a half-baked idea about support 'view source' in unmodified > applications using a similar mechanism to the one I'd considering for > Translate. This might give a better 'default' behavior for some > activities written in python, but I like Tomeu's approach for the > rest. And the general idea of having a standard mechanism to register > your own 'view source' handler is great. Maybe I'll get some time to > hack that up before Nov 17. In any case, I look forward to Tomeu's > talk!
I actually don't know what else to add that hasn't been mentioned already in this thread. Maybe Scott would like to do the talk instead as he seems to have something more exciting than me? Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
