On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:18 PM, David Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main, > and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in > it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable, > iirc. Its pretty much the same policy as debian. Scratch was recently > rejected from MOTU for the similar reasons. Would it be such a problem if squeak (and other not-squeaky-clean components of sugar) were in ubuntu restricted or debian restricted? vik
_______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
