Thanks, Jakob for the reply. I understand that Krauss model makes full use
of it's accel/decel values.

Regarding your comment,
- ACC/CACC sometimes accelerate with less than their accel value (thereby
achieving smoother trajectories)
However, does one model accelerate more or less than the other between the
two? or both of them are the same in regards to acceleration and
deceleration (ACC and CACC)

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 1:53 AM Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> The default 'accel' parameter is the same for all models (and this is
> reflected in the documentation).
> However, the driving dynamics still differ between the models:
> - Krauss makes full use of it's default accel and decel values in almost
> all traffic situations
> - ACC/CACC sometimes accelerate with less than their accel value (thereby
> achieving smoother trajectories)
>
> Am Di., 1. Feb. 2022 um 04:08 Uhr schrieb Royal Bhandari <
> [email protected]>:
>
>> Thanks, Jakob for the explanation.
>>
>> To check my understanding, the default acceleration of the Krauss model
>> is higher than that of ACC and CACC? Is there documentation listing this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Royal
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:46 AM Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The outputs are probably "valid" for the particular models but whether
>>> the ACC/ CACC models conform to the behavior of any particular real life
>>> fleet cannot be answered without prior calibration. Please also refer to my
>>> previous answer (https://www.eclipse.org/lists/sumo-user/msg11040.html).
>>> Obviously, the same holds for the default Krauss model which may differ
>>> from the driving behavior of your human fleet depending on the model
>>> parameters (and their distribution within the fleet).
>>> The metric of 'waiting time' is sensitive to the speed threshold to
>>> determine 'halting'. Thus, the strong accelerations performed by the Krauss
>>> model may have an outsized impact on this metric compared to vehicles that
>>> are "slower" to start.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> Am So., 30. Jan. 2022 um 08:25 Uhr schrieb Royal Bhandari <
>>> [email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am using average speed and waiting time per vehicle as my urban
>>>> traffic performance index. I am comparing CACC car-following model and ACC
>>>> car following models with default krauss model. I was expecting that the
>>>> CACC model will have lower waiting time and higher speed in comparison to
>>>> ACC and Krauss model in a congested network. This is true for speed but not
>>>> for the waiting time. Am I missing something here or are the outputs which
>>>> I obtained valid?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Royal
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to