Thank you Jakob for constantly helping everyone with their questions. Anyway, I used --duration-log.statistics like you mentioned and these are the two results I got. This is the result without simulating a closing route.
And this is the result with simulation of closing route. i could not comprehend everything out of this since I am a beginner. For both the scenarios, I simulated 5000 vehicles and over a time of 3600 seconds. I have used time-to-teleport as 600 seconds. However, I am not able to figure out where is the problem. Below is my --additional-file. The edges mentioned in the <rerouter> line are the same as the <closingReroutes>. If I am not mistaken, this means that vehicles which have these edges a s a part of their route, will reroute if they come across these edges. If they are going to Reroute, why is the simulation ending in a shorter amount of time than the one without closing of the route. I used the same route files and network files that I had used for the first case (without using additional file). I am keeping everything same , except that I am adding this additional file for the second scenario. Any kind of help will be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much for your time. > On Mar 24, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > indeed, your results sound quite strange. To diagnose this I recommend the > following > - run both versions of your scenario with the option > --duration-log.statistics. This will give you aggregate statistics on the > number of vehicles, their average route length, time loss etc and should be a > first hint at why the scenarios diverge this way. > - observe both scenarios visually. Often this can quickly give you a clue on > whether the scenario works as expected. To observe vehicles in a large > scenario it can be quite helpful to scale the drawing size of vehicles using > the vehicle drawing option 'draw with constant size when zoomed out' (see > http://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/SUMO-GUI#Common_Visualization_Settings > <http://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/SUMO-GUI#Common_Visualization_Settings>) > > regards, > Jakob > > 2017-03-23 16:24 GMT+01:00 Priya Toshniwal <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > <reference_timestamp.png> > > This one is my normal scenario for 3600 seconds and some x number of > vehicles. It takes 52.99 seconds to complete. However, if I am simulating it > with closing down of 2 edges in the time interval 2000 - 3000 seconds, it is > completing in time 30.84 seconds. How is that logically possible? Have I done > something wrong? I am not assigning any alternate destination to the vehicles > that encounter this closed edge. Below is the time after closing the 2 edges > for 1000 seconds. > > <Screenshot 2017-03-23 23.23.11.png> > > > > >> On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:18 PM, Jakob Erdmann <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> add the option --ignore-route-errors >> regards, >> Jakob >> >> >> >> 2017-03-23 14:44 GMT+01:00 Priya Toshniwal <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> Thank you Jakob! I tried what you mentioned. However, it is showing some >> error. I have attached the screenshot here. >> >> <Screenshot 2017-03-23 21.40.55.png> >> >> >> >> This is my additional file and i ran the command on terminal and at step >> 2000 (as you can see in the screenshot), it gave an error. In my additional >> file, I want to close only one particular edge. I picked up a random edge ID >> from my network file and I am trying to close that edge. Can you please tell >> me where I went wrong? >> >> >>> On Mar 23, 2017, at 5:16 PM, Jakob Erdmann <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> --device.rerouting.probability 0.1 >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
