>Dear Philip,
>        You have posed some interesting questions about setting up a
>dial.  You should bear in mind a few points before deciding.
>        1.      If there is any error in the gnomon angle, this will
>show worse at 6am and 6pm and will be totally invisible at 12.  
>        2.      If the dial plate is not exactly horizontal, then an
>error will show due to that.  I would think that in this case smaller
>errors would be seen at noon too.  The greatest errors due to its level
>would probably be at 9 and 3.

Dear Mike: 

Thank you for your thoughtful comments.  I make the statement that the "time
method is the prefered method for setting a sundial if and only if the
sundial is properly designed, constructed and leveled (correcting for the
EOT and longitude of course).

>        3.      If it is set up at 12, then the only correction
>necessary is EOT.  At other times it could take more brain power to work
>it out - hence more possibility of error.

Since an error in the gnomon angle is undetectable at high noon, this would
be another reason NOT to set the dial around noontime.  Right?


>        4.      This has just occurred to me and is probably not
>relevant but it has got my mind wondering.  As we know, the earth is a
>flattened sphere.  Gravity, from which we derive a vertical (and
>subsequent horizontal) reference comes from the centre of the earth's
>mass.  This is presumably right in its centre, assuming that differences
>in local density do not move it by much.  But as we move towards the
>flattened poles the angle to the centre of gravity will no longer be a
>true vertical.  But even so, it is this centre of gravity which is the
>true reference point for the earth in its orbit around the sun.  
>        Then there is the centrifugal force due to its rotation.  Will
>this effect a true vertical?  At the equator - no, but imagine a point
>at 45 degrees latitude, where the centrifugal force must have some
>effect on any plumb line/spirit level.  I guess that all of these
>effects are so tiny as to be irrelevant, but I would like to know how
>much they modify the results.

Interesting concept.  I bet Fred Sawyer or Ross McCluney are the ones who
could answer this!
>
>                           Regards,
>
>                         Mike Cowham.
>
>                     Technical Director
>
>  Thanks again Mike.  By the way, my name is John Carmichael, not Phillip
Pappas.  I just use his e-mail address.

John

Reply via email to