Yes, you did understand the problem correctly.  A shadow point is not be that
"interesting" because it would be unique for only one instant of time during the
year.  But I think there are unique observations that can be made about any
plane for a sun "setting" beyond the plane.  For example,  I can say there are Y
hours of sunshine that remain in the day for a location X whenever (any day of
the year) the sun "sets" beyond the roof of my house.  I just need a way to
calculate X and Y for and latitude and direction of plane. But X and Y are the
same  every time the sun "passed" that plane.

Jack Aubert wrote:

> Ah, but the problem specifies "flat" surface.  I took this to rule out
> convex-polygonal or elliptical/circular.
> I believe that every truly flat surface with no other obstructions in the
> way would get some glimmer of sunlight.  If the surface is facing north and
> is predominantly in the shade, it will still be illuminated during morning
> and evening hours of the summer when the sun rises in the northeast and
> sets in the northwest.  Even if the surface is facing down (!) it will
> catch rays at sunrise and sunset, assuming that it is high enough to clear
> any surrounding obstructions including mountains, foliage, etc.
>
>
> At 09:39 AM 7/19/99 -0500, William P Thayer wrote:
> >Big enough of course to fit every dialist that deserved it; but what I mean
> >is this:
> >
> >>1.  Is there any flat surface anywhere that never gets sunshine at some
> >>moment during the year?
> >
> >If you mean direct sunlight, yes, lots of them. Trivially, any point
> >adjacent to, and away from the equator from, a vertical wall,
> >convex-polygonal or elliptical/circular in plan, the ends of which cast
> >shadows on it even at summer sunrise and sunset. Tof produce a minimum
> >single point, the arc traced by such a wall would not have to be great,
> >although it increases with latitude.
> >   Extending that, there must be a zone of perennial shade -- you guys with
> >computers can calculate the general formula for its shape and extent based
> >on the latitude and the height of the wall -- including points not
> >immediately adjacent to the wall.
> >
> >Practically speaking, this is the principle behind the urban layout of many
> >old Mediterranean towns: narrow streets make for constant shade in the
> >summer; if in addition they are not straight, they also temper winter
> >conditions. I noticed this in several towns of central Italy; one of which
> >-- Pitigliano, in Tuscany -- has a sundial in about the only place it can
> >have one near ground level: in a piazza where the streets widen out.
> >
> >Geographically, there must be plenty of deep non-N-S valleys, and surely
> >steep enough mountains act as my walls, above, for places on their
> >"leeward" side so to speak.
> >
> >The question then becomes: "Where is the *largest* such surface on Earth?
> >(Now there's a project...!) A similar question would be "Where is the
> >largest *volume* of air on Earth never to see direct sunlight?"
> >
> >***
> >BTW, did anyone see the special on Noah's Ark last night? in which God's
> >rainbow was shown with the colors backward... A miracle indeed!
> >
> >
> >Bill Thayer
> >   LacusCurtius
> >http://www.ukans.edu/history/index/europe/ancient_rome/E/Roman
> >
> >

Reply via email to