Hello John,

>
> I think, in the end, absolutely anything (or things) that cast a shadow(s)
> on any surface (plane or not) can be used to describe a sundial!!
However,
> the markings get very complex.

Agreed, (not to mention the maths)!!

> Thus, to answer your question, the two threads or edges don't have to be
> parallel to the dial plane to produce a dial.  What most people understand
> by a "classic" bifilar dial does have this feature though. It leads to
dial
> markings which can be sensibly described mathematically, and  are logical
to
> look at.  My personal view, for what it's worth is that we should reserve
> the name for these cases, and describe the more exotic variants in
specific
> detail.
>
> Best regards,
>
> John

I would concur with earlier postings then, suggesting that perhaps some
further terminology might be useful.

thanks for the clarification

Sarah

Reply via email to