Add to the fact that any moron with a computer and an excess amount of time can easily manipulate the publicly available images.
My father actually helped to build the lunar lander rocket motors & Aerojet. I've seen one of the actual motors first hand. My business partner flew an ultraviolet astro camera on the Gemini, Apollo, & Skylab missions. He was inside each of the Apollo capsules before their launch. The astro camera actually went into space and photographed galaxies in the deep U.V spectrum, which does not penetrate earth's atmosphere. It's highly unlikely that millions of dollars were spent and tens of thousands of people that worked on the programs first hand were manipulated in such an manner as to pull off a hoax that even they did not know abount. -Cary Rudolf Hooijenga wrote: > > Please check out the following site: > http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html > > where the author has taken the time to debunk every single hoax claim. A > good read, even if some of it is obvious to most of us on the list. > > Of course a sundial will work. But with no atmosphere, a guy in a white > spacesuit is also a good source of light, to say nothing of the lunar > lander, some rocks, the soil itself.. > Oh yes, and the flag. Try unsquashing a piece of cloth from its tiny hold, > and holding it out on a stick, with NO wrinkles showing. :-) > > Have fun! > Rudolf > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Frank Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 5:29 PM > Subject: moon shadow > > > Greetings fellow dialists, > > A recent news item suggests that one in five Americans doubt that the > > Apollo 11 moon landing in 1969 took place, that it was in fact a hoax. > (..)
