Third attempt at sending this message - anyone know what's wrong?
J
 
 
Hi Patrick et al,
 
Interesting that we should get opposite results from our surveys of dial pictures!  Possible reasons for this are that all the double-horizontal dials I looked at were C17/18, so the preferred orientation may have changed from inward to outward over the years.  Another possible reason is that the DH dials tend to be large, so they are less susceptible to "serif crowding" when tops of the letters are on the inside.  On the other hand, with very large dials the tendancy of the viewer is to walk around the outside to read them, rather than to take a bird's-eye view from the south.
 
Perhaps there's a need for another line on the BSS Report Form?
 
Best regards,
 
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr J R Davis
Flowton, UK
52.08N, 1.043E
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is an interesting topic for me because as Registrar of BSS I have to
enter the various distinguishing features of dials that have been found by
our Members.  I have recently taken to remarking on the arrangements of the
numerals where the appearance looks different from the norm.  Sadly with
over 4000 dials of all types I cannot easily put in comments for all dials!

Internally viewable numerals (and other 'different' arrangements!) are a
feature that is more commonly found with vertical dials where I would guess
the different arrangements occur more or less with equal regularity.
However I haven't done a check.

In horizontal dials though there is most definitely a bias to arranging
Roman numerals to be read from the outside - a rather quick statistical
estimate made by me just now by looking through 174 horizontal dial photos
in the BSS Register (an estimate which is however flawed by the fact that
some photos did not permit an observation of the numeral arrangement!)
indicates that as few as 11% of dials have internally viewed numerals. Even
allowing (say) a factor two - a likely overestimate in my view -  for those
dials whose photos do not permit an observation we can, I think, say that
only about a quarter of horizontal dials are engraved with internally
viewed numerals.

It is a topic that might bear further analysis since you see several old
dials and dials by famous makers (like Melvin) with internally viewed
numerals as well as new ones.

I agree with you that the internal arrangement generally looks better - if
for no other reason than that it facilitiates reading the dial from the
South looking North which, for me, is the way I often find myself looking
first at a dial.  However, maybe I am just wierd!

Regards  Patrick



Reply via email to