Hi Alain

There is a subtile difference between "meridian transit" and "culmination".
The first term means the point  and the instant where  and when the diurnal
path of a celestial body crosses the meridian of an observer.
The second one indicates the moment (and the point in the celestial sphere)
of the higher altitude reached by the body in its diurnal path.
If the celestial body has a fixed, invariable declination "transit" and
"culmination" occur in the same time and the altitude is the maximum the
body can reach.
For bodies whose declination is variable (specifically the Sun and the Moon,
but in effects also "fixed stars" and generally all celestial bodies have
very very small variations) the two moments are slightly different and
different are the corresponding astronomical altitudes and azimuths.
For normal persons fond of Astronomy the question is irrelevant, but not for
Astronomers and (sometimes) for Seamen too.
Before the "GPS hera" when sailors used sextants and stars for fixing their
position at sea (a few years ago), in some exceptional occurrences, they had
to distinguish between transit and culmination about the Sun to get more
precision in Latitude determination. The difference was determined not only
by the variable declination of the body but also by the speed and the course
followed by the ship.
This is in theory. Actually I think that a very few sailors paid attention
to distinguish the two moments, due to the small difference resulting.

Best regards

F.Martinelli
------------------------------------------------------
Nautical CollegeARTIGLIO
Viareggio (Italy)
http://www.nauticoartiglio.lu.it
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lat 43.8N Long 10.2 E
------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to