John
Any figure on a plane will throw an identical figure at all hours on a plane parallel to the first. A circular aperture on a plane parallel to the dial face will throw a circular image at all times.
Brian Albinson

John Carmichael wrote:
Hi Chris:
 
But I'm not so sure I agree with you about a flat disk with a small hole.  The aperture disk nodus you described works fine when the sun is not at low angles relative to the face.  example: a direct south vertical wall dial around midday.  But if it's early morning or late afternoon, won't both the shadow of the disk and the projected solar image elongate into long ellipses?  In fact, if the sun is hitting the disk nearly edge on, I bet the solar image projection might disappear all together.  If you could manually rotate the disk so that it is perpendicular to the sun, then I would agree with you.  But sundial I'm designing is high above a doorway and can't be touched. 
 
Interested in anybody's comments on this,
 
John
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: Conical Gnomon Advantages

Hi John et al,
If you want a circular shadow that doesn't elongate when the sun is at a small angle to the dial face, you can use a circular disc, held parallel to the plane of the dial. A large disc with a small circular hole in the middle works very well, too.
 
The tip of a cone is an excellent idea, but I imagine it would only be practical for dials that are above head height, as the tip would seem dangerous otherwise.
 
Chris
51.4N, 1.3W
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 5:12 PM
Subject: Conical Gnomon Advantages

Hello All;
I have always been a big fan of spherical nodi on a perpendicular gnomons.  I just like the way they look and when the shadow is only slightly elliptical, sundials with them are pretty easy to read.
 
But in doing some shadow tests for a new wall dial I am designing, I was greatly dismayed by how much the shadow elongates when the sun is at a small angle to the dial face. The shadow ellipse is so stretched along the major axis that the dial would be very difficult to read.
 
So, it occurred to me that a nodus that is the tip of a cone might be better.  So instead of guestimating the center of an ellipse, you look at the shadow of the point of the cone.  (To test this, I attached a brass conical plumbob to a threaded brass rod).  I figured that a cone would work better than a flat arrow because it has a uniform cross section around it and therefore would cast a uniform shadow as the sun rotates around it during the day, unlike a flat arrow.
 
The shadow tests on the conical gnomon worked great even at low solar angles. 
 
John 


---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial


--------------------------------------------------- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

  
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to