I remember John Carmichael did some experiments on a truly monumental 
sundial, The McMath-Pierce Solar Observatory, Kitt Peak  Arizona. I think he 
put the judgment point for the transition well towards the dark side at 
about 85% dark.

That was long ago and far away so I would appreciate any comments to refresh 
my memory.

Regards,
Roger Bailey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Lusby Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Monumental Sundial; 14 missing seconds


> Dear Chris,
>
> I am a bit behind with my reading and I have only
> just read your comments, and corrected comments,
> on the umbra discussion.
>
> Subject to your corrections, I concur with almost
> all you say but I feel a little amplification of
> one of your follow-up remarks is needed.  You
> say...
>
>> If the gnomon is ... a conventional wedge-shaped
>> gnomon with two style edges, then you can adjust
>> the hour lines, by a little under a minute.
>
> I am very nearly happy so far!
>
>> This adjustment is definitive, in the sense that
>> it is irrespective of the time of day, time of year,
>> size of sundial, type of sundial (horizontal or
>> vertical) or latitude.
>
> Yes, I am still happy [subject to your qualification
> later that "the sun moves faster across the sky at
> the equinoxes than at the solstices"].
>
> My need for amplification is confined to the
> 50 seconds figure here...
>
>> It is an angular change (about 50 seconds of time),
>> not a linear change.
>
> It is indeed an angular change; it's the 50 seconds
> figure which I feel needs a bit of amplification...
>
> At the equinoxes the sun obligingly trundles along
> the celestial equator (well close to it) at a rate
> of 1 degree every 4 minutes of time or 1 arc-minute
> every 4 seconds of time.
>
> Consider a bug, sitting on the 2pm hour-line (say),
> looking at the sun (via special eye protection) as it
> approaches the business edge of a fat wedge gnomon.
>
> There will be a period lasting just over two minutes
> (to be justified below) of significant interest:
>
> 1. Since sunrise the bug has been able to see the
>    entire solar disc and has been basking in full
>    sunlight.  Then, about 13:59 sun time, the sun
>    makes first contact with the edge of the gnomon
>    and, soon afterwards, the bug notices a drop in
>    light.
>
> 2. The solar disc steadily slips behind the edge
>    and, about 14:01 sun time, we have second contact.
>    Thereafter, the sun is wholly behind the edge and
>    the bug is in maximum shadow.
>
> Taking the angular diameter of the sun to be 32' the
> time taken from first contact to last contact will
> be 128 seconds.  This, measured in time, is the full
> width of the umbra.
>
> The time from 14:00 to second contact is 64 seconds
> and I pondered how to reduce this to 50 seconds...
>
> [Aside: of course I agree that you divide by the
> cosine of the declination if you are not at an
> equinox and the angular diameter varies a little
> from 32'.  These, as you say, are minor matters
> though the first INCREASES the 64 seconds.]
>
> You later say, and again I concur, that "most people
> seem to judge the edge very close to the dark side."
>
> The key words here are "very close".
>
> To reduce the true 64 seconds to the apparent
> 50 seconds you seem, implicitly, to be saying
> that "very close" translates into 14 seconds of
> time, or 3.5 arc-minutes, about 10% of the solar
> diameter.
>
> This feels about right but I should love to see
> the results of some properly set-up experiments.
>
> I can imagine that the results would be different
> for going from shadow to light (morning times)
> from going from light to shadow (afternoon times).
>
> Do you have some mathematical justification that
> has escaped me for the missing 14 seconds or is
> this just a sensible estimate?
>
> Best wishes
>
> Frank
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>
> 

---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to