I cannot believe or accept that the "Nanny State" has gone this far. In the future overprotective society, will everything attractive be banned? Will kids have to wear crash helmets and full protective clothing before approaching the great attractor?
I have not heard of any safety or nuisance problems on any of my public sundial installations, both analemmatic sundials and those with pointed gnomons. Well perhaps one. A client installed my vertical declining designs a little too low on the wall facing their deck and pool. They had to move it farther up the wall to keep well above harm's reach. This client is a lawyer. Most of those who answered your note would be happy to provide design information and not request a liability waiver or statements from the police. If you have the land owners approval for the installation, go right ahead. Roger Bailey Walking Shadow Designs www.walkingshadow.info ps. When travelling, I follow the advice of Tony Moss and no longer carry "instruments of math instruction" due to security problems. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Linda Reid" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 11:20 AM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Do the Police really object, to interactive 'Human Sundial' features? > > Dear Members of this 'Mailing List', > > I am a mosaic artist, based in the United Kingdom - and am currently > working with a local Community Arts organisation on a project, plus > one part of which is to be a proposed "Sunclock" ('Human' Sundial). > > We were intending to obtain a customized set of layout plans, from > "Modern Sunclocks" (in Scotland) - but it seems that they require a > 'disclaimer' letter from us, acknowledging that we fully understand > all the implications of creating this feature in a public location. > > They directed us to a page on their website, which details what can > happen - that specific page is: www.sunclocks.com/pics/fs-015.htm > > > Those 'negative' aspects are outlined at the top of that page, and > they also said that Planning Permission might not be approved - due > to objections raised by local residents, plus 'Police' authorities. > > I then had a brief discussion with a local Police Community Liaison > Officer, who said that he fully appreciates why "Modern Sunclocks" > were just being honest with us - plus that some interactive public > features would be likely to attract 'undesirable' people, who "take > it over" as theirs (so discouraging people who we want to use it). > > > Is this really true, that what we think should be a very colourful, > functional and interactive 'Human' Sundial - will eventually become > a feature which actually the local population do NOT want to have? > > "Modern Sunclocks" were very helpful - and said that they could sell > three times as many sets of plans, if only they did not have to warn > customers about the 'implications' (based on many years experience). > > > Do the members of this 'List' have any comments (good or bad), about > installing such interactive sundials - since we do not want to go to > the time and expense of creating this, if local people do not really > want it. Most people said they would be happy, (although we did not > mention any of those negative factors, when conducting short "market > research" - because we were totally unaware of them, at that time). > > I shall very much look forward to receiving feedback, on the above. > > > Sincerely, > > Linda Reid. > > > > -- > > --------------------------------------------------- > https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial > --------------------------------------------------- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
