Meeus's Astronomical Algorithms is not out of print. Check out
http://www.willbell.com/math/mc1.htm. Also, it's cheaper on the publisher's
website ($30 + S&H).
Brad

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Kevin Karney <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Kaarigar
> Firstly WELL done. Your web interface is very nice. I think it's great when
> people get back to basics and understand the background physics/astronomy
> behind their gnomonics. I remember the satisfaction that came when I first
> worked things out and found I could generate results of surprising accuracy.
>
> To calibrate your routines you should use NASA's JPL's Horizons program or
> US Naval Observatory MICA - which others have mentioned. The Horizons web
> application is superb inasmuch as it is easy-to-use, free, fast and can
> deliver results in spreadsheet format back to your computer. It is
> continuously updated for the earth's erratic slowing and its internal DE405
> routines for the positions of solar system bodies are used by MICA as well -
> so represents the best available technology. The Horizons printable user
> guide (which you do not need) contains the wonderful exhortation "if your
> career or spacecraft depends on a non-lunar satellite or small body
> ephemeris, contact JPL before using it...".
>
> The most sophisticated do-it-yourself astronomical routines available are
> to be found in Meeus' book "Astronomical Algorithms" which is (I think) out
> of print, expensive but usually available on abebooks.com. (Does anyone
> know of a book that betters Meeus ???)
>
> What is of interest to gnomonists are *simple* routines that give *
> sufficient* accuracy for sundials. I made a tiny check on your results for
> today at 8 & 20 hrs UTC = midnight & midday California time using MICA.
> RA was correct to 11 secs of arc
> Declination was correct to 3 secs of arc
> Altitude was correct to 21 & 87 secs of arc
> Azimuth was correct to 82 & 39 secs of arc
> The variable error in altitude & azimuth *may* *be* because you just
> calculated a geocentric RA & Decl, whereas to be entirely thorough one
> should calculate the topographic RA & Decl. But, on that tiny sample, your
> routines are MORE than good enough for any gnomonic studies !
>
> A few small points to clarify on your web interface...
> 1) Right Ascension has no units, you have put it in degrees - but it is
> frequently quoted in hours ? Also, by convention, it is always rectified to
> within 0 - 24 hours or 0 - 360 degrees. (In contrast, Hour angles by
> convention are always rectified to -180 to +180 degrees).
> 2) Are your times in local mean time, local standard time or UTC? Your
> results seem to be in local standard time - which is logical !
> 3) The sign used for your longitude conforms to IAU convention, but many
> gnomonists seem to prefer +ve West
>
> I was interested to know where you came from - so assumed your web
> interface default location was your home. You appear to live at sea, in the
> San Francisco Bay!!
>
> What is the background of your calculations ?
>
> Best regards
> Kevin Karney
> Freedom Cottage, Llandogo, Monmouth NP25 4TP, Wales, UK
> 51° 44' N 2° 41' W Zone 0
> + 44 1594 530 595
>
>
> On 2 Feb 2011, at 20:22, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I had asked a question earlier about how to design a contraption such that
> a sunlight beam falls on a place (or point) exactly each year at a specific
> time. Having gone through the responses and realizing that I will have to
> learn to do some basic solar position calculations myself, I have
> implemented it and made it available through a web site - please check it
> out and let me know if it is right/wrong/ or simply works. Thanks!
>
> http://www.heliometry.com/solpos
>
> Kaarigar
> ================
> ---------------------------------------------------
> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to