Wolfgang R. Dick <[email protected]> wrote: > Some time ago, there was a dicussion here on the future of UTC and > theleap second. Therefore I think that this announcement could > be of interest to some members.
See also this preprint from American Scientist. Note that the people involved in both the article and the colloquium are in favour of keeping leapseconds. http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3141 The ITU-R has also issued another questionnaire to its member states on this issue. It has remained controversial at every level as it has progressed through the ITU's bureaucracy. The final stage will be a vote at the radiocommunication assembly next year. http://www.itu.int/md/R00-CACE-CIR-0539 Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Trafalgar: Northerly 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8. Moderate or rough. Mainly fair. Good. --------------------------------------------------- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
