Dear All, As the list administrator I'm writing to you that the DMARC topic is annoying a lot of mailing list users. Some explanations are given here: https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC
This sundial mailing list is currently hosted by a Mailman version 2.1.29 installation (I have no influence on this). Yet, I could not dive into the topic and the implications of changing settings in the Mailman software. Before changing any setting, you as a member of the list would have to check that you are sending to the sundial mailing list from the address with which you have subscribed to the list. You can check this here: https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial Best regards Daniel Roth, sundial mailing list Roger schrieb am 11.09.2018 05:31: > > We are all frustrated by the overhead on these DMARC wrapped messages. The > emails generally contain valuable information like Kevin Karney’s link. Why > are these massages “not DMARC compliant?” Generally because the sender has > changed their email address. Perhaps they contain hypertext. Perhaps it is > the nanny state insisting on things that restrict freedom “for your > protection”. My advice is to seek the content and ignore the overhead. Check > the properties and source for your typical emails. They also have a lot of > similar but hidden overhead. I enjoy the benefits but still “rage, rage > against the fading of the light”*, the enlightenment we all receive from > these postings. > > > > Thanks Kevin for sharing such an excellent study on the equation of time. > https://Equation-of-Time.info with hypertext removed > > > > Regards, > > Roger Bailey > > Walking Shadow Designs > > > > *“Do Not Go Gently..” Dylan Thomas > > > > > --------------------------------------------------- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
