Daniel, I think that now would be an appropriate time to thank you for the Sundial Mailing List, and for the wide-ranging resources page that you also keep online.
I don't know how long you have maintained the SML, but I know that I have been a member of it since the 1990s, and it has been a valuable resource for me as I have progressed with my dialing activities. It used to be one of the only online resources, before the sundial societies and others had really refined their web sites to the point where they are now. It has been a reliable international meeting place for dialists for years and years, despite the occasional dust-up (remember Prof Ruby?) and it has been a common thread between many of the regional sundial societies. It is still a great place to ask questions, the brainpower here is awesome. I am amazed that something that has been on the internet for so long has been able to weather so many changes and still work as well as it does. Thank you so much for dealing with it for all these years! Best, Jim Tallman www.spectrasundial.com www.artisanindustrials.com [email protected] 513-253-5497 This message is being sent remotely as I am currently out of the studio. Please excuse any further delay in response. On Sep 11, 2018, 5:46 AM, at 5:46 AM, Daniel Roth <[email protected]> wrote: >Dear All, > >As the list administrator I'm writing to you that the DMARC topic is >annoying a lot of mailing list users. Some explanations are given here: >https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC > >This sundial mailing list is currently hosted by a Mailman version >2.1.29 installation (I have no influence on this). > >Yet, I could not dive into the topic and the implications of changing >settings in the Mailman software. Before changing any setting, you as a >member of the list would have to check that you are sending to the >sundial mailing list from the address with which you have subscribed to >the list. You can check this here: >https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial > >Best regards >Daniel Roth, sundial mailing list > > >Roger schrieb am 11.09.2018 05:31: > >> >> We are all frustrated by the overhead on these DMARC wrapped >messages. The emails generally contain valuable information like Kevin >Karney’s link. Why are these massages “not DMARC compliant?” Generally >because the sender has changed their email address. Perhaps they >contain hypertext. Perhaps it is the nanny state insisting on things >that restrict freedom “for your protection”. My advice is to seek the >content and ignore the overhead. Check the properties and source for >your typical emails. They also have a lot of similar but hidden >overhead. I enjoy the benefits but still “rage, rage against the fading >of the light”*, the enlightenment we all receive from these postings. >> >> >> >> Thanks Kevin for sharing such an excellent study on the equation of >time. https://Equation-of-Time.info with hypertext removed >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Roger Bailey >> >> Walking Shadow Designs >> >> >> >> *“Do Not Go Gently..” Dylan Thomas >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------------------- >https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
--------------------------------------------------- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
