BTW, I like sundials that tell the ecliptic-months, Aries thru Pisces.

…for which one would need the Solar declinations for the beginning of each
ecliptic-month, & preferably also for some fractions of each
ecliptic-month, such as 1/3 & 2/3.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:16 PM Michael Ossipoff <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Michael Ossipoff <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:16 PM
> Subject: Re: How to turn ecliptic longitude into solar declination?
> To: Steve Lelievre <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
> Or you  could just use the ecliptic longitude, reckoned as usual from the
> Vernal Equinox…multiply its sine by the sine of the obliquely & take the
> inverse sine of the result.
>
> I’d suggested that other way because there are some spherical trigonometry
> formulas that require an argument between 0 & 90 degrees.
>
> …but that isn’t one of them.
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:49 PM Michael Ossipoff <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Multiply the sine of ecliptic longitude (reckoned forward or backwards
>>> from the nearest equinox) by the sine of 23.438 or whatever the current
>>> obliquity’s exact value is).
>>>
>>> Take the inverse sine of the result.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 4:57 PM Steve Lelievre <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>> Of course you’ll know when the declination is negative or positive, so
>> mark it accordingly.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> For a little project I did today, I needed the day's solar declination
>>>> for the start, one third gone, and two-thirds gone, of each zodiacal
>>>> month (i.e. approximately the 1st, 11th and 21st days of the zodiacal
>>>> months).
>>>>
>>>> I treated each of the required dates as a multiple of 10 degrees of
>>>> ecliptic longitude, took the sine and multiplied it by 23.44 (for
>>>> solstitial solar declination). At first glance, the calculation seems
>>>> to
>>>> have produced results that are adequate for my purposes, but I've got a
>>>> suspicion that it's not quite right (because Earth's orbit is an
>>>> ellipse, velocity varies, etc.)
>>>>
>>>> My questions: How good or bad was my approximation? Is there a better
>>>> approximation/empirical formula, short of doing a complex calculation?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>>>>
>>>>
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to