On Jul 28, 2005, at 14:04, Ivar Janmaat wrote:
You would only want to pay for the client software (altough I like
the opensource idea also)
But illegal copying of client software is hard to prevent.
So I can imagine Sun wants to implement some server side
restrictions to prevent this.
Connection billing is than the easy way out.
Well I am happy to pay per client or per unlimited for the client.
The same as I do for the hardware.
Server restrictions are a bad idea. I would hate to have to explain
to a user why they can not connect to their session from their
laptop, but could if they had a hardware client.
Opensource is a good idea, and I think with the Tarantella purchase
we may see them just implement RDP. <fingers crossed>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please support Team Qualcomm/SAIC find a cure for MS. Sponsor me in
MS150
http://ms150baytobay.com/darkavich
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Misrack
Staff Engineer
Qualcomm, QCT-Engineering Systems
+1.858.651.7535
Never confuse having a career with having a Life
-- Eddie Bauer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
