Hello,
To Thierry
Is DHCP server running ?
# svcs dhcp-server
STATE STIME FMRI
online 9:53:41 svc:/network/dhcp-server:default
~~~~~~
Does DHCP configuration still exist ?
# dhtadm -P
And does DHCP Address Resources still exist ?
# pntadm -L
# pntadm -P <IP_Subnet_Address>
To Russell
Thanks.
However, Sun Ray Server Software 3.1 Beta has not written into
/etc/inet/ipnodes on my machine.
Is it a BUG ? ?(o_O)?
Lebar, Russell J wrote:
> Thierry: The issue sounds like it is DHCP/Java related. Have you changed
> /usr/java or /usr/j2se? Have you verified DHCP and the DHCP tools still
> work?
>
> Hajime: FYI, On Solaris 10 systems you should check /etc/inet/ipnodes
> first and then check /etc/inet/hosts (ipnodes is read first). You should
> also keep the IPv4 entries sync'd between the two files. [ The
> /etc/inet/ipnodes file has actually existed since Solaris 8 but the
> installer never put any entries in it so unless you were doing IPv6 you
> could ignore it. However, the Solaris 10 installer actually populates it
> so you now how to pay attention to it. ]
>
>
> Some interesting trivia: Solaris 7 Hardware Release 5 contained new
> versions of the DHCP tools that required a new version of Java to work.
> Now, since Maintenance Updates only contain the patches apply MU5
> applied the DHCP patches but did *not* include the new Java version they
> needed to work, effectively breaking DHCP. Not very good for a Sun Ray
> server.... ;-)
>
>
> -- Russ
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hajime suzuci
>> You can check some files as following:
>>
>> /etc/inet/hosts
>> /etc/inet/netmasks
>> /etc/inet/networks
>>
>> If any "SunRay" entry is in those files, ifconfig works
>>automatically.
>> Or ... DHCP configuration ?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Hajime Suzuci,
>>
>>
>>Thierry Delaitre wrote:
>>
>>>i tried to remove the interface of the sunray interconnect
>>
>>and put it
>>
>>>back and there are some interesting results:
>>>
>>>bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utadm -d ce1 ### Removing Sun Ray
>>>information for interface "ce1"
>>>Configuration for DHCP interface ce1 does not exist.
>>>### Removing Sun Ray interface configuration for "ce1"
>>>LAN connections are on to allow Sun Ray connections from shared
>>>networks Do you want to turn off LAN connections? ([Y]/N): n
>>>bash-3.00# ifconfig -a
>>>lo0:
>>
>>flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu
>>
>>>8232 index 1
>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
>>>ce0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu
>>
>>1500 index 2
>>
>>> inet 161.74.91.26 netmask ffff0000 broadcast 161.74.255.255
>>> ether 0:3:ba:9b:47:dd
>>>ce0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>
>>
>>mtu 1500 index 2
>>
>>> inet 192.168.252.1 netmask ffffff00 broadcast
>>
>>192.168.252.255
>>
>>>bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utadm -a ce1 ### Configuring
>>>/etc/nsswitch.conf ### Configuring Service information for Sun Ray
>>>Error: unable to add vendor options to dhcp:
>>> Error: cannot add SunRay symbols to dhcptab:
>>> Could not create the Java virtual machine.
>>>Error: cannot add server macro "SunRay" to dhcptab:
>>> Could not create the Java virtual machine.
>>>
>>>The only thing i did was to apply the latest recommended
>>
>>patches for
>>
>>>Solaris 10!
>>>
>>>BTW, is 3.1 being released soon ?
>>>
>>>Thierry.
>>>
>>>On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Thierry Delaitre wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I've got 2 sunray servers configured as a group. I'm sure i had
>>>>configured them as a group. however, the secondary server is now
>>>>telling me that the sunray interconnect framework (ce1) is not
>>>>configured ! is this a bug ? Is that because i've ran utadm
>>
>>-L on after or defined an ip alias on ce0 ?
>>
>>>>Thierry.
>>>>
>>>>bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utadm -a ce1
>>>>Error: Interface "ce1" already configured; cannot add
>>>>
>>>>bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utadm -l
>>>>LAN connections: On
>>>>Sun Ray interconnect framework is not configured
>>>>
>>>>bash-3.00# ifconfig -a
>>>>lo0:
>>
>>flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu
>>
>>>>8232 index 1
>>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
>>>>ce0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu
>>
>>1500 index 2
>>
>>>> inet 161.74.91.26 netmask ffff0000 broadcast 161.74.255.255
>>>> ether 0:3:ba:9b:47:dd
>>>>ce0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>
>>
>>mtu 1500 index 2
>>
>>>> inet 192.168.252.1 netmask ffffff00 broadcast
>>
>>192.168.252.255
>>
>>>>ce1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu
>>
>>1500 index 4
>>
>>>> inet 192.168.129.2 netmask ffffff00 broadcast
>>
>>192.168.129.255
>>
>>>> ether 0:3:ba:9b:47:dd
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>SunRay-Users mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>SunRay-Users mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
