Re: [SunRay-Users] Load Balance in SRSS 3.1 Sparc - TCBDaemon: packet receive error

Fri, 07 Apr 2006 00:02:25 -0700

Ok, then I would skip the bug issue. I would do utwho -c, utpolicy, utgstatus and uptime.
I'll send you as immediate as I can.
Thanks
Fitra

Bob Doolittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fitra budi anggoro wrote:

> I am still working on these error. It seems the problem not only for
> the load balance but also with some bugs in SRSS3.1.
> One of Notes from explorer we've ran "TCBDaemon: packet receive
> error". I've checked on sun solution, and this is a bug (6240056). It
> said it is occasionally happen, but it happen quite a lot. Any ide guys?


I wouldn't necessarily worry about this unless you're seeing an
actual problem. The firmware has been known to whine needlessly
in syslog before :-( It's almost certainly unrelated to load
balancing. From what you have described your Sun Rays are not
hanging and showing an icon of 26D, are they? So it doesn't look
like bug 6240056 to me.

Before you send out 3MB of data, which is a lot of data to pore
through, could you try the small tests described in the mail below?
With only two servers it should take only a minute to run these
commands.

Regards,
Bob


>
> I can send you the explorer but it takes 3 MB. Can I send personally
> to someone who might interested?
> Thanks a lot and Warm Regards
>
> Fitra
>
> */Bob Doolittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
>
> Also, are these logged in sessions, or only login-greeter
> sessions? utwho -c would be interesting to see. The
> difference between utwho -c and utwho -ac is that the
> latter one counts login-greeter sessions, whereas the
> first form is just logged in sessions.
>
> What is your policy (output of utpolicy)?
>
> -Bob
>
> ottomeister wrote:
>
> >On 3/27/06, fitra budi anggoro wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I've got 80 clients connected to 2 x [EMAIL PROTECTED] USIV 32 GB. What
> really strange
> >>is 75 clients connected to Server A and only 5 connected to
> Server B.
> >>Shouldn't SRSS 3.1 have Load Balance Capabilities? It should
> have right.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >SRSS tries to balance system load, not number of DTUs, but even so
> >that seems like a very skewed distribution.
> >
> >What do 'utgstatus' and 'uptime' show on each of these machines?
> >
> >If one of the users on Server A logs out, does he then get offered a
> >login on Server B?
> >
> >OttoM.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger�s low PC-to-Phone call
> rates.
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>SunRay-Users mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
>

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to