why fiber? doesn't that just add unnecessary cost? at least to me it
does.
-troy
Jerry K wrote:
I'm not speaking for Joe, and personally would have preferred a
firewire/1394/iLink port. But to directly answer your question, when
plugging in an iPod, or other MP3 media player, close to 100 Mb of
data transfer sure beats the 12 Mb transfer rate of USB 1.1?
Regardless, I have had a request for quote to my reseller to get a 2FS
as soon as they are available.
Jerry Kemp
Craig Bender wrote:
Why is that by the way?
Just curious since you'd never be able to write @ USB 2.0 speeds over
the network anyhow. Even on a PC things like drive mapping to Citrix
or RDP typically on write in the sub 100 Kbps range.
Do you have (or know of any) USB 2.0 only devices (which according to
the USB spec would be illegal since they should all be backwards
compatible).
Joe Reid wrote:
Yeah - I just wish the "smaller" version was USB2.0
Troy Knabe wrote:
Much nicer looking than the 1g's. We have found the stands break a
lot on the 1g when people push the device back in. This looks like
an integrated stand. And USB port on the front will be nice as well.
-Troy
Daniel Martinsson wrote:
Check out
http://www2.sun.de/documentation/datenblaetter/pdf_downloads/SunRayUltra-ThinClients_0406.pdf
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
begin:vcard
fn:Troy Knabe
n:Knabe;Troy
org:Western Oregon University;University Computing Services
adr:;;345 N Monmouth Ave;Monmouth;OR;97361;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Systems Administrator
tel;work:(503) 838-8798
tel;cell:(503) 931-9140
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
