It seems we have Sunray 2.0. To install 3.1, do I ./utconfig -u first? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Doolittle Sent: Friday, 6 October 2006 1:58 PM To: SunRay-Users mailing list Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Is this possible?
John Simovic wrote: > Is there a command I type to find which version of Sunray software I am > running? > Running where? If you want to know what's on the server, you can use pkginfo -x SUNWuta for instance. If you want to know what's on a particular Sun Ray and you know it's IP, you can use utquery -d <IP>. Or you can run utfwload -a to see all Sun Rays connected to this server currently and what firmware they are running. -Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bender > Sent: Friday, 6 October 2006 9:52 AM > To: SunRay-Users mailing list > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Is this possible? > > Do you just have one server? > > Install the lastest SRSS Patch for your specific version. There is a > readme file that has detailed instructions for updating the firmware > correctly across all members of a fog. > > Typically however if it's one server (or you like to just get it over > with) and you have a private interconnect all you have to do is run > > /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utfwadm -a -A -n all > > The sun rays will get the new firmware the next time the cycle. > > From then If you do the dns or option 66 with parms files (which I like > the most), all you have to do is /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utfwadm -a -A -v since > your Sun Ray server will most likely just be configured with utadm -L on > instead of doing any thing like shared or private interconnects. Makes > life a lot easier. > > > John Simovic wrote: > >> Sorry for the dumb questions but I am total noob when it comes to sunray >> > but > >> am keen to learn. To download the latest fw to clients do I just run all >> > the > >> relevant patches on the server and then have the clients connect and the >> ./utfwsync? >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bender >> Sent: Friday, 6 October 2006 9:13 AM >> To: SunRay-Users mailing list >> Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Is this possible? >> >> Perfectly fine. Are you all up to date on your firmware levels? If >> not, take advantage of your private interconnect to make sure that you >> are running the latest FW. >> >> Remember when you're done to delete the private interconnect as well via >> utadm -d interface >> >> John Simovic wrote: >> >> >>> So it is ok for me to put the sunrays on the same switch as the windows >>> >>> >> pcs >> >> >>> and then issue utadm -A subnet? Thanks for the information. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bender >>> Sent: Friday, 6 October 2006 7:37 AM >>> To: SunRay-Users mailing list >>> Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Is this possible? >>> >>> Why don't you just let windows provide DHCP to the whole network. >>> >>> utadm -A subnet will configure solaris DHCP to just give out Sun Ray >>> specific information. Or check out using the new options such as option >>> 66, dns client, and parms files. >>> >>> http://blogs.sun.com/ThinkThin/entry/sun_ray_provisioning >>> >>> John Simovic wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi guys. We have a Sunray network and currently it is segmented on a >>>> different switch to avoid problems with the windows network we have. Our >>>> switches do not support vlan's. Is there a way I can have the Sunray >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> network >>> >>> >>> >>>> on the same physical switch and have the sunraqy server only hand out >>>> >>>> >> dhcp >> >> >>>> addreswses to sunray devices (MAC address) without affecting the windows >>>> network? Ie the windows clients would still receive their ip from the >>>> windows dhcp server? Are there any down sides to doing this if it is at >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> all >>> >>> >>> >>>> possible? >>>> >>>> Kind Reghards >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SunRay-Users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SunRay-Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SunRay-Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> SunRay-Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SunRay-Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users > _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
