Hmm so running in 1024x768 for example will help things along quite a bit.
You could always run in 800x600 to save even more ;-)
--
Leigh
Craig Bender wrote:
How about no window manager. Why use one at all if you are going full
screen windows?
How big is the resolution of your screen? 1280x1024 will cause XSun
to consume about 28 MB, 1600x1200 roughly 36 MB.
You should see usage like this for each cam user (remember under CAM,
Xsun runs as root so you have to factor that in)
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
13001 utcu1 6056K 4800K sleep 59 0 0:00:07 0.0% rdesktop/1
12940 utcu1 1472K 1384K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% utstartkiosk/1
12962 utcu1 1360K 1264K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% WBTStart/1
13000 utcu1 2768K 2328K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% utaction/1
12939 utcu1 1472K 1376K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% bbstartd/1
12936 utcu1 1472K 1376K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% bbcontrol/1
12931 utcu1 1376K 1280K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% sh/1
Which you can compare to this session with a windowing manager:
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
10192 utcu0 1472K 1384K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% utstartkiosk/1
10290 utcu0 4736K 4192K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% ttsession/1
10288 utcu0 28M 24M sleep 59 0 0:00:07 0.0% dtwm/1
10214 utcu0 1360K 1264K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% WBTStart/1
10287 utcu0 6312K 5376K sleep 59 0 0:00:08 0.0% rdesktop/1
10191 utcu0 1472K 1376K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% bbstartd/1
10188 utcu0 1472K 1376K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% bbcontrol/1
10183 utcu0 1376K 1280K sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% sh/1
10217 utcu0 28M 24M sleep 49 0 0:00:06 0.0% dtsession/1
If you do do icewm, can you get us a prstat -u UID so we can see what
it's requirements.
Leigh Porter wrote:
You could probably go lighter still and use a very basic window
manager if all you have is the Windows connector running full screen
and no native apps. You could even remove the window manager
altogether I guess.
--
Leigh
Brad Lackey - US-SW Desktop Product Lead wrote:
In the scenario below gnome doesn't load either...
i was describing CAM mode on Solaris... If you're using icewm expect
the 90 mb number to be lower, bu the 60mb number will probably still
hold true.
Brad
John Simovic wrote:
Forgot to mention that I have a generic user (only one) logging in
under icewm. Then a script calls rdesktop to the windows terminal
server. Gnome doesn’t even load.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Brad
Lackey - US-SW Desktop Product Lead
*Sent:* Tuesday, 10 October 2006 10:08 PM
*To:* SunRay-Users mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [SunRay-Users] Thanks for all the advice. Worked a
treat.NOW.....
The processors will likely be close to adequate, but memory is
going to be your short fall...
Each CAM user using uttsc will take about 90 mb of RAM....
If we take your 4096 and subtract some (256) for system overhead
and divide by 90 we get about 42 concurrent users.
If you remove dtsession from your applications list you can save
about 30 mb per user.
(4096-256)/60 = 64 concurrent users
Brad
Leigh Porter wrote:
I do not see why it should not cope just fine, I had a V240 with
similar spec and had 30 or so users with lots of apps, lots of
hungry Java development stuff (Eclipse etc) and there was room for
more.
--
Leigh
John Simovic wrote:
We have a v880 with 2 933 UltraSparc Processors and 4 gig RAM. This
server
is only serving a login screen for the clients who immediately get
a windows
session via rdp. Will this server cope with 70 clients just being
redirected
to winbloze?
Kind Regards
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
--
*Brad Lackey*
Desktop Product Lead
US Software Practice
(720) 548-3339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
--
*Brad Lackey*
Desktop Product Lead
US Software Practice
(720) 548-3339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
