Only one user on the system, both processes below belong to him:
  PID USERNAME  SIZE   RSS STATE  PRI NICE      TIME  CPU PROCESS/NLWP
14955 root       33M   31M cpu17   10    0   0:02:42 4.0% Xsun/1
15298 utcu0      11M 9560K sleep   59    0   0:00:05 0.1% uttsc-bin/2

utcapture output:
# TERMINALID      TIMESTAMP TOTAL PACKET   TOTAL LOSS   BYTES SENT
PERCENT LOSS      LATENCY
00144f4892dc 20061012175713         9199            0     12729082

We just upgraded to a beta version of the Sun Ray 2 firmware (that
fixes other issues) in a shot-in-the-dark attempt to see if it would
help (it didn't, no change).

I don't believe the MTU should be an issue, as the Sun Ray Server and
DTUs are all on the same private VLAN and I believe on the same
switch.

Thanks,
Kevin


On 10/11/06, Craig Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin,
Does utcapture show anything.  Have you tested the MTU.

While this is happening, what does Xsun (runs as root) for this display
show and what does uttsc-bin show?  Can you get me some prstat -u UID
and prstat -u root info (try to correlate the display for me to the Xsun
process).

Is there anyway you can help us recreate this?

Kevin Burtch wrote:
>
> Both front-end and back-end (Sun Ray VLAN and LAN interfaces) are set
> to auto resulting in 100/full on both the Suns and the switch ports
> they are connected to.
> (they don't have gig-e switches at that site)
>
> Output of netstat -i shows zero errors.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> On 10/11/06, *Alejandro Soler* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     *Look at the network switch configuration for sunray, and the type
>     of conecction (if its full duplex, or half duplex)*
>
>     *Cheers *
>
>     *On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:11:53 +0000, Ross Morrison wrote*
>
>
>     > Kevin,
>     >
>     > I think I may have seen something similar to what you describe.
>     We had three Sun Rays connected via a gigabit switch to a V440
>     machine.  When we used certain graphic intensive programs the Sun
>     Ray's would become unresponsive and in some cases they would lose
>     connection to the server entirely.  We resolved the issue by
>     limiting the network port on the V440 to 100MB to match that of
>     the Sun Rays and this resolved the issue.
>     >
>     > May not be the same but something to check?
>     >
>     > Cheers
>     > Ross
>     >
>     > Kevin Burtch wrote:
>>     This is a tough one.
>>     > We have a deployment on an island, very remote, using some in-house
>>     > developed software managing sensitive data.
>>     > I mention this, as I have never personally *seen* the issue, and I
>>     > won't be able to. We cannot move the software and data here for
>>     > reasons I can't go into.
>>     >
>>     > The problem is:
>>     > When a user generates a report, cells are being redrawn on the
>>     screen
>>     > (that's all I can get out of them). When this happens, they lose
>>     all
>>     > responsiveness with the mouse and keyboard until the program
>>     finishes
>>     > the report.
>>     >
>>     > CPU load is minuscule (single user on a T1000) on the Sun Ray
>>     Server.
>>     > The software itself is running on a Windows Terminal Server. If run
>>     > directly, or remotely via a windows PC, it runs in 15 seconds
>>     with no
>>     > loss in interactiveness.
>>     > When run via a Sun Ray, it takes a minimum of 80 seconds and all
>>     > interactiveness is lost.
>>     >
>>     > What I've tried:
>>     > Sun Ray Connector for Windows 1.0 (released version)
>>     > Sun Ray Connector for Windows 1.1 (beta version)
>>     > rdesktop 1.4.1
>>     > rdesktop 1.5
>>     > Applying every patch I can find related to X.
>>     >
>>     > All have the same problem.
>>     > This actually surprised me, as the symptoms are exactly the same as
>>     > those I DID see fixed in Connector 1.1 (we had that problem at
>>     another
>>     > site). Only the trigger seems to be different (it's not
>>     scrolling as
>>     > far as I know, just rapid repaints of cells).
>>     >
>>     > Anyone have any ideas?
>>     >
>>     > Thanks,
>>     > Kevin
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > SunRay-Users mailing list
>>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>>     >
>>     >
>
>     >
>     > --
>     >
>
>     >
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     SunRay-Users mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to