Joerg Barfurth wrote:
> ottomeister schrieb:
>> A known issue in nv_96 is that some X binaries were incorrectly
>> built so if you want to use SRSS on 96 you'll need to fix those
>> binaries by using 'elfedit'. This bug has been fixed in nv_97.
>> If you're committed to 96 then I can explain how to fix the
>> binaries, if AlanC doesn't beat me to it.
>>
>
> Can you provide the details, please?
>
> I have just set up a snv96 system for running SRSS and going to 97 would
> be a real hassle at this point.
Xsun should actually work as long as you don't try using LBX (at
which point it will crash), you'll just see it trying to mount
/net/paravon, since one of the libraries used for lbx changed from
static linked to shared, but the library didn't get into the packages
correctly, and the link path for it got set to /net/paravon/... from
the build machine. You can probably use elfedit to delete the
/net/paravon/... runpath (I haven't tried), but liblbxutil.so.1
still won't be found.
Of course, if you're running snv_96, why not also run the SRSS beta
that provides the Xorg-based Xnewt server and run that instead of Xsun?
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
