William Yang wrote:
4.1 on S10U6.  I don't know if this is possible because of the way AFS does
PAGs.

And pam_sunray is on the xscreensaver (or dtsession-Sunray if CDE) stack in /etc/pam.conf?

I'm afraid I don't know anything about AFS and we don't support it :(

-Bob

William Yang

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Doolittle
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 11:12 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] How to make JDS lock screen lock the screen
and not utdetach with NSCM

William Yang wrote:
Regarding RHA security...

Does anyone else on the list deploy Sun Rays in a Kerberos 5 and AFS
setup?
We seem to be stuck with forcing users to unlock twice since
unfortunately
we need the screensaver to refresh a user's tickets and tokens.  Since
the
RHA dialog creates a temporary session, the tickets and tokens for the
user's session aren't refreshed when it is used, so for the time being
we
use RHA and screensaver lock to achieve better security and still
maintain
the ability to refresh session creds.  Any ideas?

What version of SRSS?

What OS platform are you using? If it's Linux, then we may have an issue
here since gnome-screensaver doesn't handle PAM properly so we can't
utilize pam_sunray (which refreshes creds on the screensaver stack) and
use utxunlock instead.  utxunlock has no way of directly refreshing creds.

-Bob

William Yang


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joerg Barfurth
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 6:39 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] How to make JDS lock screen lock the screen
and not utdetach with NSCM

You can do much of what you desire by editing /etc/pam.conf. But the
result is an unsupported configuration.

David Markey schrieb:

They could manually detach the session using shift+pause, its just
complicated for our users and id like to disable it. i see its hard
coded into xscreensaver. Any way to disable it even unsupported?


You could remove or turn into a comment the
   xscreensaver auth sufficient pam_sunray.so syncondisplay
line in /etc/pam.conf.

The price you have to pay for that is that when hotdesking to a
different DTU with your NSCM session or after the session has been
detached in whatever other way (e.g. by rebooting the DTU), you'll have
to enter your password twice - first for NSCM, then for the
screensaver.
You also lower security for your session, as explained by Bob.


Also, when i do a utswitch -h <hostname> the previous user name gets
entered into the new sunray servers login, any way to disable that
also?
For NSCM users: To get rid of the name you can use the startover
button.
To never get that name in the first place, you could try to remove the
    utgulogin auth requisite sunray_get_user.so  property=username
line in /etc/pam.conf.

To achieve the same effect for smartcard users, you'd need to also
remove the
    dtlogin-SunRay auth requisite sunray_get_user.so  property=username
line. Beware: This might be incompatible with NSCM (though I haven't
tried). In any case you enter unsupported territory here.

Do not remove the analogous line for utsclogin!

HTH

- Jörg

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to