I don't understand how it does it *with* TX; is there a good doc somewhere?
Ceri On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:24:50AM -0800, DJG wrote: > Hi Alfred, > thanks for your email. > I still don't understand how Sun Ray server would be 'zone aware' and log > individual users in to different zones without TX. Even if I use kiosk and > cards, how will the Sun Ray server allow users to use different zones? How > would you set up kiosk for individual users that they can use zones? > > Can you please give a bit more details? > > Many thanks, > Dan > > > --- On Wed, 4/2/09, Alfred Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Alfred Levy <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] SRSS and Solaris Zones > > To: [email protected], "SunRay-Users mailing list" > > <[email protected]> > > Date: Wednesday, 4 February, 2009, 1:01 AM > > You can create (non-global) zones in Sol10 without using > > Labeling (TX). You > > won't have to worry about the label_encodings file or > > any other security > > measures. Each non-global zone would be an independent > > entity. Same process > > as Zones under TX, but using a different template i.e., not > > "create -t > > SUNWtsoldef". Do not need to enable the labeld > > service. > > > > With SRSS on top of a zoned, non-TX system, you would still > > assume each > > zone, or do a zlogin or ssh into the zone from the global > > zone. Or use kiosk > > mode and give each card or user their own zone for their > > use. Apps could be > > installed in the global zone for all users, or, if they are > > friendly, into a > > specific non-global zone for a specific user. > > > > Wish that I could have that much freedom. Heavily dependent > > on TX... > > > > AJ > > > > > > On 2/3/09 6:50 PM, "DJG" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I know that SRSS doesn't run in zones and I > > don't want SRSS in zones. > > > > > > I just wonder if is possible to use SRSS to connect to > > individual zones in > > > similar way as in Solaris TX, however I don't need > > to use STX and all the > > > additional security. > > > > > > Obviously I could use LDoms or xVM, but zones would be > > much lighter and > > > better. So if there isn't anything else, I will > > use STX though I would prefer > > > to avoid all the additional labels. > > > > > > Many thanks, > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > SunRay-Users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users > > > > > > ___________________ > > > > > > This email has been scanned for all viruses by Webroot > > Email > > > Security System. > > > ___________________ > > > > > > ___________________ > > > > This email has been scanned for all viruses by Webroot > > Email > > Security System. > > ___________________ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere
pgpWVwnl6WUFc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
