ottomeister wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Joseph Chiong <[email protected]> wrote:
Please confirm the following is a known problem:
Case 1:
Given a 10.200.100.0/24 subnet,
Sun Ray Server 1 (SR1) with single NIC
- Interconnect: 10.200.100.1
- DHCP Scope: 10.200.100.10 - 10.200.100.70
Sun Ray Server 2 (SR2) with single NIC
- Interconnect: 10.200.100.2
- DHCP Scope: 10.200.100.71 - 10.200.100.130
SR1 and SR2 are configured in the same FOG.
When DTU gets an address in the DHCP scope of SR1 (e.g. 10.200.100.30) and
connects to SR2 in a Kiosk session, this cause a problem.
This should be fine. What problem does it cause?
Do these machines literally have a single NIC that is attached to a
Sun Ray interconnect, and no other network connectivity? Or do
they have other NICs that connect them to the rest of the world?
Apart from the Sun Ray interconnect, there is one NIC that is used as
Sun Ray public network. The NIC has an IP 192.168.100.200. A user's
print request to a printer connected to the redirected COM port in a
Windows Kiosk session will fail in this case. If the DTU gets an address
in the DHCP scope of SR1 and connects to SR1 (or the same case for SR2),
the problem disappears.
Case 2:
Given a 10.200.100.0/24 subnet,
Sun Ray Server (SR) with two NICs
- Interconnect 1: 10.200.100.1
- DHCP Scope: 10.200.100.10 - 10.200.100.70
- Interconnect 2: 10.200.200.1
- DHCP Scope: 10.200.200.10 - 10.200.200.70
Is this a supported configuration?
Technically it's supported, but unless you're a DHCP expert we
recommend that you don't do this because it can fail in a
surprising way. If you decide to take this approach then the
range of DHCP addresses should be at least double the number
of Sun Rays that you intend to deploy onto this interconnect.
I do experience this case fails in a surprising way. I didn't mention
explicitly in the last message that the two NICs share the same
broadcast domain. Will this worsen this case?
OttoM.
__
ottomeister
Disclaimer: These are my opinions. I do not speak for my employer.
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4063 (20090508) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
--
Joseph Chiong
eSuria Mentari Systems Sdn Bhd
Unit 9, 1st Floor, Block A
Kiarong Complex
Bandar Seri Begawan BE1318
Brunei Darussalam
Ph: 673-2423721
Mobile: 673-8145285
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.esuria.com.bn
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this email by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4063 (20090508) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
