I was playing around with one of my new 3+ DTUs yesterday and have one comment and one question regarding it.

First my comment: I noticed that as I was testing the streaming media performance, the chassis got quite hot. Testing my 2FS side-by-side, it never gets nearly as hot as the 3+. It does get a bit warmer than normal, but not what I'd call "hot" like the 3+ does. So far, under normal usage (productivity and development apps), it doesn't seem as bad. It's still warmer than the 2FS under similar usage, but not hot.

Background for my question: In our lab, we have the DTUs mounted horizontally under the desktop using aluminum U-channel we cut and drilled for brackets. This has worked quite nicely with the 2FSs. It left the cardslots exposed (should we ever want to use them), as well as the Kensington lock slot. We were also able to use the threaded socket used to mount the base plate as a point to anchor the DTU to our custom brackets.

With the new design of the 3+, this presents some challenges. With the cardslot on the top, in our mounting brackets, we will not be able to use them. Since we don't currently use them, nor do we have plans to, this is not a big deal. With the new snap-on base, we've lost our convenient anchor point to secure the DTU to our bracket. Our plan is to instead add an L-bracket to the back of the unit and screw into one of the unused serial port nuts.

And finally the question: The 3+ has two large vents on the side. I assume these are for airflow to keep the internals cooler, as the unit runs noticeably hotter than previous models. What is the recommendation on clearance for these vents? The question is important because it helps me decide which way to mount them like the rest of my lab.

If we mount them with the vents facing up (towards the underside of the desk), we would have about .5" of clearance. If this is not enough, then we would obviously have to mount them with the vents facing down (towards the floor). The drawback here is that we no longer have access to the Kensington lock slot. This is probably not a huge issue, since if a unit was stolen, the thief would not be able to do anything with it. But it would still be nice to secure it if possible.

Thanks in advance for your input.

Seth

--
Seth Galitzer
Systems Coordinator
Computing and Information Sciences
Kansas State University
http://www.cis.ksu.edu/~sgsax
[email protected]
785-532-7790
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to