Do you mean SRS 5.2.3  or is there a special 5.3 version.
and if  it's 5.2.3 how did you get over the missing patchadd error?

regards jon

2011/11/8 Keith Paskett <[email protected]>

> I have tested SRS5.3 on Openindiana and it has been working fine.
>
> ----
> Keith Paskett
>
> On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:37 AM, Francois Dion <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Running SRS5.2 on solaris x86 without issues, and in a vm on top of that.
> >
> > If you need a more modern desktop, we are only a day away of the release
> of solaris 11... I'm assuming that this will be well supported with solaris
> 11 express having been out for a year and whatnot.
> >
> > Anybody tried an srs install on openindiana?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:36, Jon Slonkowski <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I'm currently evaluating switching SRSS from Solaris to  Linux because
> we're have to change from SPARC to Intel.
> >> I could accept OL because its supported but the installation on OL 6
> fails.
> >> Going through the archives of the SRSS-mailing list, I found a mail
> that states that SRSS is not supported on OL6.
> >> But is it not possible to install SRSS at all?
> >>
> >> We need a somewhat modern linux version, so using OL5 is not optimal....
> >>
> >> what to do?
> >>
> >> regards jon
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SunRay-Users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunRay-Users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to