On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
I committed to reviewing this draft. I only have one suggestion for the
authors to improve legibility: itemising the specific set of criteria for
review in section 2.
I also attach the reviewed document.
P/S: This is my first review so I might not be aware of a proper procedure
to submit it, please point me to the right procedure if this isn't it.
I also promised to review this document.
I found nothing objectionable in the document, it looks useful and I
support it.
I had a thought though, I remember a linux kernel message I saw a long
time ago regarding an soon-to-be-deprecated API, and that it gave syslog
warnings that a certain process used it. Would it make sense to recommend
operating system manufacturers to implement functions so admins/users
could see what applications uses legacy IPv4-only-APIs? Or perhaps just
say that a gap is that it's hard for the user to know what applications
use ipv4-only API and thus they could be helped by understanding this
better to know if they can turn off IPv4 completely or if they need to
keep it running but might firewall it or something?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
