Nope, the G3 is largely based on the 603 processor. The 604 was more or less the end of that particular core. That is one reason why the Floating Point scores for early G3s were lower than 604 processors.
-Robyn On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 04:42 PM, Aughenbaugh, W wrote: > I assume you meant that a 604 is a glorified 603. However, that isn't > really > the case. The architecture is somewhat different. The 603 was designed > for > low power applications while the 604 was designed for performance and > not > efficiency of power utilization. -- SuperMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | Service & Replacement Parts [EMAIL PROTECTED] | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> SuperMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/supermacs/list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/supermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- >The Think Different Store http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
