On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Avery Payne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Alternatively, are there general-purpose practices for breaking this kind >> of dependency? >> > Strange as it sounds, renaming the child definition of a dependency chain > (which typically translates into the directory name of the defintion) seems > to be a regular issue. Changing the name of the definition typically > causes various "links" to break, causing the parent service to be unable to > locate its children by name at start-up. >
Ah, I just realized you misunderstood me. You understood "breaking dependencies" to mean "the dependant system no longer works" where what I meant was "the dependency is no longer relevant".
