On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:35:37 +0000
"Laurent Bercot" <ska-supervis...@skarnet.org> wrote:

> >Thing is, I've always thought of anopa as a set of tools, that allow
> >you to set things up however you want. I like that idea, and so
> >that's why it doesn't create service(dir)s on its own, unlike
> >s6-rc.  
>   I totally agree with that philosophy, but all the pressure I'm
> getting is always in the direction of "make it more user-friendly,
> accessible to normal people, integrate it more, more high-level
> commands" - never the other way.

Sure, I get that; And to be clear I wasn't in any way "criticizing"
the magic in s6-rc, just merely explaining why I left it out of anopa.
It certainly is a cool thing from a user POV to have s6-rc handle all
that as simply/easily as it does.

But even though anopa doesn't do this on its own, you're right, I
should probaly have it (that "aa-command" longrun) somehow featured in
anopa, or make it easy for people to use it without having to figure it
out & write it on their own... Still thinking about how I'll do this.


Reply via email to