(Quoting this e-mail for context) 2017-10-29 5:37 GMT-03:00 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: > > Since SIGWINCH to process #1 is already taken by Linux, I have adjusted my > softwares to use SIGRTMIN+7 and SIGRTMIN+17 for the signals to process #1 > for this, ready for when Linux eventually catches up with this idea. (-:
Which reminds me, are there any plans to add SIGWINCH to the set of signals that 's6-svscan -s' can divert? G.
