(Quoting this e-mail for context)

2017-10-29 5:37 GMT-03:00 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
>
> Since SIGWINCH to process #1 is already taken by Linux, I have adjusted my
> softwares to use SIGRTMIN+7 and SIGRTMIN+17 for the signals to process #1
> for this, ready for when Linux eventually catches up with this idea.  (-:

Which reminds me, are there any plans to add SIGWINCH to the set of
signals that 's6-svscan -s' can divert?

G.

Reply via email to