On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 15:37:35 +0200 Alex Suykov <alex.suy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The reason I think it's mostly useless is because the only use case > for cgroup supervision is supervising double-forking daemons, which > is not a very smart thing to do. A much better approach is to get rid > of double-forking and then just directly supervise the resulting long > running process. > I can't think of any other cases where it would be useful. I definitly have to correct you: cgroups are *NOT* designed to catch wild forking processes. This is just a side-effect ot them. The purpose is to control resource limits, like CPU, RAM, Disk I/O and so on. So for linux it would definitly make sense to have an interface to the full feature set. Best Regards Oli -- Automatic-Server AG ••••• Oliver Schad Geschäftsführer Turnerstrasse 2 9000 St. Gallen | Schweiz www.automatic-server.com | oliver.sc...@automatic-server.com Tel: +41 71 511 31 11 | Mobile: +41 76 330 03 47
pgpibEWGc65QS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
