Anders Quist wrote: > I just implemented the primitives for making it possible. I'm not sure > if it makes sense to do an implicit reread. If add does an implicit > reread, you may end up with this: > > > avail > foo > > add foo > foo: no such > > since foo was actually not in the config any more. It seems to me that > having an explicit read makes it easier for the user to have a mental > model of the state of supervisord.
The "avail" command was not implemented and the decoy was removed by Chris in r786. The scenario above can't happen with the current implementation. Mike -- Mike Naberezny Maintainable Software http://maintainable.com _______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
