Hi Roger, On 11/24/09 12:07 PM, Roger Hoover wrote: > Thanks for offering to make the changes. I certainly don't mind if you > want to do it. I imagine you're very busy, though. Let me know if you > have the time and desire. Otherwise, I can do it.
I'll do as you suggest and put a conditional around them so we can get the next release out. This is low priority so I will add a note to the TODO list about making those tests run under 2.3 and I will take care of it eventually. There are some issues I should fix ahead of this but I'm happy to do it. > So, do you want to avoid using mock all together or can we just avoid > using the decorator stuff? I like the mock package. Compatibility with 2.3 is the only issue. If we get it to run under 2.3 then I think it's fine. Thanks, Mike -- Mike Naberezny Maintainable Software http://maintainable.com _______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
