Robert Kaiser wrote:
Jens Hatlak schrieb:
Rufus wrote:
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring
of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0
now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong
128 bit?..I hope...

No, it doesn't encrypt by default, only obscure.

From what I know, that's not really true, we don't obsucre in the new password manager, we always encrypt, but default generate a key from an empty master password.

Robert Kaiser

Omone esle linked me to this -

http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html

Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128 bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do need to give it the Master to show passwords in the Manager.

If not, can you point me at what SM 2.0 is actually doing? Really would like to see some feedback in the dialog box as to encrypted vice simply obscured like in 1.1.18. Thanks.

--
     - Rufus
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to