Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus wrote:
http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html
Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128
bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do need
to give it the Master to show passwords in the Manager.
Not sure, I both don't have the time to read the whole document nor am I
an expert on the password manager. We're using exactly the same password
manager in SeaMonkey 2.0 though as in Firefox 3.5, and AFAIK, you always
need to enter the master password if you want to access any passwords -
just that in the default case, the master password is empty and if it's
empty, we don't ask for one (but we use the empty master password for
encrypting the passwords on disk).
Robert Kaiser
...and is it true that SM uses strong encryption?
--
- Rufus
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
