John Doue schrieb: > Phillip Jones wrote: >> Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> JAS wrote: >>>> Bill Davidsen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Funny that there are volunteers to take out working and useful >>>>> features, but none to tweak them if they break. I suspect that anyone >>>>> who needs to handle a number of value sets for the same form will >>>>> continue to use 1.1.18. At least until Chrome gets the new form >>>>> manager. >>>>> >>>> I for one am glad it is not in SM2 as I never did use it. A program can >>>> not please everyone. Perhaps you can volunteer or donate for someone to >>>> put forth an effort to fix what you seem to find the Form Management so >>>> vital that you can not use SM2 without it. >>>> >>> I think you miss the point, it was in, it worked, someone took the >>> time to >>> remove it. No amount of volunteer will put it back in, because >>> someone wanted it >>> out. >>> >> I used Forms manager at least once a week. What was good about it , >> was you could pre fill in information so that when a page form asked >> for it showed up. Obviously the people that take out stuff , don't use >> it and taking it out, not realizing many people almost depend upon it. >> But because they don't use it they find it necessary. That what >> happens when the developers, don't pay attention users or customers. >> > I could not have said it better! :-)
You're missing the point on this whole issue I think. Seamonkey2.0 moved to the new toolkit backend. The old Form-Manager could _not_ be kept that way, it needs a "rewrite". As noone was there to maintain that code and noone implemented a new solution there is none (or at least not the way it used to be). regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
