MCBastos wrote:
I recently ran into Bug 105955 (
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105955> ), which echoes
some of my thoughts about Seamonkey.
It was marked as WONTFIX back in 2002 by Hixie, under the reason that
"we should be separating the programs instead of joining them." Well,
Thunderbird and Firefox are separated now, so in that regard he was
right, but Seamonkey is geared into better integration between mail and
browser -- so that logic no longer applies.
Daniel Wang's comments on the problems caused by different UI in the
modules make a lot more sense, but still, this is almost 2010, not 2002.
A lot has happened since then. The Firefox team is looking into a Google
Chrome-like window layout, with tabs on top. Seamonkey might go that way
eventually too -- and in that case, Wang's reservation disappear.
So... maybe is time to revisit this bug and see if it's worth reopening
it? Maybe not even targeting for SM 3, but reserving it as a long-term
goal, as "future"?
We already have that in SM2.
It absolutely useless PIA. Thank goodness I turn off tabs something
else to computer memory resources.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
