Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/8/2009 4:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After all, what are ALL the complaints that have surfaced
been about, if not SM2???????? :-(
You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 has destroyed anything?
To Mark Hansen: As I have stated elsewhere, there is, NOW, an obvious
problem in that there are two John's using this newsgroup, but it can
easily be cleared up if people would remember the other John, does not
leave a last name, but that I do! :-(
By the way, I am keeping you both separate. But what has this to do
with my post? You (John Boyle) said, as is still shown above, that
installing SeaMonkey has been known to destroy all sorts of things.
Again I'll ask:
You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 had destroyed anything?
Absoultely
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
