On 12/8/2009 5:31 PM, John wrote: > Mark Hansen wrote: >> On 12/8/2009 4:20 PM, John Boyle wrote: >>> Mark Hansen wrote: >>>> On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote: >>>> >>>>> To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a >>>>> SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY >>>>> ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED >>>>> THROUGH IT! After all, what are ALL the complaints that have surfaced >>>>> been about, if not SM2???????? :-( >>>>> >>>> You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 has destroyed anything? >>>> >>> To Mark Hansen: As I have stated elsewhere, there is, NOW, an obvious >>> problem in that there are two John's using this newsgroup, but it can >>> easily be cleared up if people would remember the other John, does not >>> leave a last name, but that I do! :-( >> >> By the way, I am keeping you both separate. But what has this to do >> with my post? You (John Boyle) said, as is still shown above, that >> installing SeaMonkey has been known to destroy all sorts of things. >> >> Again I'll ask: >> >> You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 had destroyed anything? >> > Absoultely
Well, perhaps you could share it, because in all your blustering, you haven't shown it yet. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
