jim wrote:
XP, SP2
Seamonkey 2.0.1
IE 8
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:58:48 -0500, jim<j...@earthlink.com> in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:21:17 -0700, Jim<no_...@anonymouse.org> in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
<snipped out older messages>
Don't give up. :-)
From what you have said, this is what I would do at this point:
Go in and see of the old directory structure is still intact: SB:
C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey --<drive possibility here>
If so, use it, if not, make it, and then,
Put any old standalone .exe into *that* Seamonkey directory and rename it
as "Seamonkey.exe", then,
****************
See if it gets called from seamonkey.......................
***************----------------------^^^^^
Error, error, mea culpa -- I meant "see if it gets called from Lotus
Notes".
Clarification: by "standalone.exe" i mean one that does not require
other files to execute.
That would do one thing if it is called -- show you that it is the path
involved. If so, you can do one of two things ----- reinstall sm 2.x to
*that* directory, OR pass that golden info to the IT dept. and change the
SM icon(s) target(s) until they get it "fixed". [I have two icons, one
for browser and one for mail]
(Actually, there are three possibilities if it is the path)
But the third "fix" possibility requires uninstallation/reinstallation of
some older software.....
I have not used Lotus Notes, but if it is like the old Lotus 123 R5, the
.ini files would be a likely place to look for paths..........
Understand, it may not be showing you a path, but it may have one in an
.ini or compiled into a DLL.
jim
Thanks for your reply. However, I'm now on Christmas vacation until
next year :)
So I'll look at it some more, if its not fixed by then.
Jim
(think we got too many Jims here :)
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
