Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus wrote:
A two year cycle is about standard for what I do, and what I manage is
WAY more complex than something like SM...the short cycle model works
just fine for security and "under the hood" fixes, the long cycle model
works better for major interface changes.
You just have more or less said that what you work on is not in the
slightest way related with the Internet. In this place, a few weeks or
months can mean life or death for a software project.
Robert Kaiser
Exactly...which is why I'm so puzzled at the intransigence of some of
the people on the team when I read the bug reports. I would have
expected the team to be far more flexible and responsive to user
feedback...particularly in light of what has been said about "not
allowing the project to die". Where is the teams sense of urgency?
--
- Rufus
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
